| All rights reserved. |
| This page will present a series of essays on black studies and the study of blackness, updated on a more or less monthly basis, from the forthcoming anthology, Rebels without a Name: Selected Essays in Black Studies and the Study of Blackness. |
1969 |
| The Black Anglo-Saxons 1962 Walk into any large city in the United States and look for that section where more than 90 per cent of the population is native born. When once you have found that section, you may safely assume that you re smack dab in the Negro ghetto. Ask the names of the people you meet, and you will note that the Anglo- Saxon names now extant---Jackson, Brown, and Johnson---are pretty much the property of the Negro inhabitants. This is just one of the cues to the identity of a curious but little- known class---“Black Anglo-Saxons”---now flourishing in American society. If you now proceed until you come to the “better” Negro dwellings (known as the homes of the “high class” or the “biggity”), you will find yourself at last amid the Black Anglo Saxons proper, though not all of the “high class” belong to this tribe. Black Anglo-Saxons are such chiefly in that, in their natural struggle to throw off the smothering blanket of social inferiority, they exaggeratedly seek to sever their own historical and social past in order better to assume that of the biological descendants of the Anglo-Saxons.They relate to and long to be a part of, the elusive and hostile white world, whose norms are taken as models of emulation. Likewise, the white world is to them a looking glass for taking stock of their personal behavior. They acquire in this way what sociologists call a “looking glass self,” an image they must keep on grooming, to make what they think the white society thinks they are in accord with what they themselves would like to be: more and more like whites. For several years now, in diverse localities throughout the country, I have been subjecting members of this group to casual but intensive observation. I have watched them, close up, in their private lives (for many were and are close friends, relatives and neighbors) as well as in public places. From both the private and the public perspective, I discovered that Black Anglo-Saxons fall into typical categories: The Image-makers. Image-makers are dithered by their belief that all Negroes have to do to break down discrimination is impress the white community with proper public manners and the sincerity of the negroes’ quest for integration. They are constantly fearful lest whites think they are prejudiced against whites or have a preference for Negro companionship. Thus, it is more or less mandatory for Negroes to spread out, when in an integrated gathering, to keep whites present from thinking “we segregate ourselves.” Points of worry for image makers may crop up in many facets of their lives. While such groups as Italians boast of their spaghetti and meatballs, for example, Negro image-makers may privately consume huge quantities of low-in-come Southern foods but disown the practice in public. Many image-makers will never buy watermelons when white persons are in sight, and I have seen them sit in restaurants, mouths watering at unsuspecting whites seated before large, red slices of melon, which the image-makers long for but can’t bring themselves to buy. Chitterlings likewise are a basis for hypocrisy. Although some of the best chitterlings still are to be found in Negro kitchens, the Black Anglo-Saxon housewife typically seeks to hide her appetite for them. Most take extreme pains to safe guard knowledge of their menu from neighbors. This is especially so in integrated apartment dwellings. Such other staples as mustard greens and black-eyed peas also are privately enjoyed but publicly shunned before whites. The Mimics, or Copycats. Close kin of the image-makers, mimics are especially prevalent among school teachers and white collar workers. They chronically mimic white mannerisms in the quest for a feeling of similarity or closeness to their white ideal. A “white accent,” for example, is to them honorific, because it is taken to represent a high degree of association with the “better class” of whites. In the effort to “talk like a white person,” mimics effect a snarl or twang imitative of whites when talking publicly or to strangers, though, if you listen long enough you are likely to hear an “I” pronounced “ah,” plus other tell-tale signs of their lowly Southern origins. This enthusiasm for aping white behavior pervades the most personal intimacies of their lives. Married mimics, for example, are prone to hold up white men or white women as ideals to their mates. When a male mimic’s wife does something that bothers him, he is likely to tell her “wouldn’t nothing do that but a colored woman.” By the same token, when a female mimic is peeved by her spouse, she also talks about his heredity or makes the declaration that his “type” is “no account” in general anyway. The Cultured. With the increasing value of education in society and the rising educational attainment of Negroes, the importance of the college degree has soared to the highest. Some social scientists detect a “degree class,” those individuals who derive their prestige from the sole fact that they hold degrees. But inasmuch as such persons typically are employed as school teachers, social workers, and church pastors, their salaries are often lower than such uneducated negroes as the steel mill hands. This leads to some dilemmas and resentments. Every janitor, for example, has found it necessary, at some time or another, to “tell off” some of the “high class tenants,” for trying to “boss him around.” The degree class is seldom interested in scholarly matters, however, except superficially. Books, in fact, would seldom enter their homes, were it not for book-of-the-month clubs. Even this is no guarantee that the books will be read. Yet, those of the home- owning variety are beginning to acquire “studies” (usually equipped with plush bar facilities, relaxing couch, and a small book stand conspicuously placed and containing a couple of shelves of textbooks salvaged from college days). The chief activities performed in these “studies” are drinking, “cat naps” and lounging (called “relaxing”), in that order. At a typical house party of ‘educators,” a budding discussion will quickly disperse the inhabitants of one room into another, where they may resume their efforts to learn the latest teenage dance crazes, such as, the Madison, the Twist, and the cha-cha- cha. It is true that the twist has demonstrated some capacity for arousing the energies of most negro and white adults, but its acceptance by the whites is taken by the Black Anglo-Saxon as an irreproachable justification for his own enthusiasm. Black Anglo-Saxons are quick, however, to profess a passion for the “cultured” things of life, especially the aesthetic. Thus, they require little provocation to let you know that they hardly ever listen to blues, or “that monkey music,” but rather go in for “symphonies,” which they collect from mass record clubs and place on the top of their record stacks. Underneath, hidden from immediate view, lurk the more groovy numbers such as Big Joe Turner’s “Hi Yo Silver.” Some music major friends of mine once gave a party for some classmates on a tour with their alma mater’s choir. Naturally, an impressive stack of long-playing symphonic recordings led off the music fare. But at last, as the guests sighed with boredom amid strains of Beethoven’s Fifth Symphony, the main hostess privately bemoaned to me the somber mood of the party and her apparent failure as a hostess. I inched over to the phonograph, reached under the stack and pulled our Little Richard’s “Slippin and Slidin” whereupon the party came to life. Music majors and all forgot their fugues and counterpoint to pop their fingers and stomp their feet in uncontrollable ecstasy. However, many of them remarked that that was the first time they had ever heard of Little Richard. The Sociable. Because black Anglo-Saxons, like most other Negroes, are severely restricted in the extent that they are allowed to be active in the organized life of American society, social participation tends to become an end in itself. Consequently, even most civic groups become mere recreational associations, having as their main function the “throwing” of “annual balls,” “spring formals,” and the like, where members and selected guests parade in rented and borrowed “tails” and “formals.” Individuals feel compelled to appear “sociable” for fear of losing status in the group, and I have known couples to get divorces because, as they said, one or the other was “not sociable enough.” The Secluded. Bounced back by the wall of segregation, Black Anglo-Saxons compensate by decreasing their proximity to the regular Negro world. This separation is in terms of both spatial and social distance. Ministers contend that as many Negroes move up educationally and begin to prosper financially, their religious fervor wanes accordingly. Eventually, many find themselves uncomfortable in the highly expressive congregations of the Negro masses. Consequently, as sociologist E. Franklin Frazier was quoted once as saying, they are “running from the Baptist to the Congregationalist and the Bahai, trying to find some place where people don’t know they’re colored.” One frequently encounters the saying: “Deliver me from the average Negro.” Parents seek to shield young children from knowledge of racial reality, often going so far as to spell out references to race: “Was she a N-E-G-R-O?” Or, An old W-H- I-T-E man really made me mad today.” Thus many are able to grow up and take pleasure in the boast that they never knew there was a difference made between Negroes and whites until they “got grown” or reached the age of, say, 15 or was “going on 16.” In general, the secluded seem to think that the sooner they forget they are Negroes, the sooner whites will too. The foregoing are by no means all of the categories, but all have in common an almost pathetic clamor to gain acceptance in the general American society. Perhaps, subsequent to the day when this has been accomplished, the “Black Anglo-Saxon” too will disappear from the North American scene. -- by Nathan Hare. Reprinted from Negro Digest, May, 1962 .______ TO BE CONTINUED: From the forthcoming Anthology,om the forthcoming Anthology, Rebels Without a Name: Selected Essays in Black Studies and the Study of Blackness |
Appearing in the February 10, 1969 issue of Newsweek in the middle of the five-months strike for black studies at San Francisco State was an essay by Dr. Nathan Hare, typed out on a small lap-held portable Underwood in the strike headquarters of the "White House" (the second floor of the Ecumenical House that wore white paint and stood across the street from the entrance to the campus). The Newsweek editors titled it "The Case for Separatism" in concession to the opposition statement, "The Case Against Separatism," by Roy Wilkins, then National Executive Secretary of the NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored Peoples). Mr. Wilkins's opposition to the idea of black studies was based on his belief that black studies was separatist, although he expressly endorsed the "teaching of black history and culture" in his statement! Wilkins also seemed to ignore the blatant fact that white student and faculty protesters were predominant in the daily noonday rallies of the black student-led strike of faculty and students numbering in the hundreds and sometimes thousands, including the day the police tactical squad surrounded the rally and stealthily encircled, captured and arrested a stark diversity of five hundred and fifty-seven individuals who had been unable to flee or escape the police dragnet operating under an impromptu ad hoc declaration of "martial law" and arresting hapless students and professors on such charges as unlawful assembly, failing to disperse and disturbing the peace." Dr. Hare had stated six years before that day (in an article called "The Negro's Escape from Freedom" published in Negro Digest) that "integration and separation may both be promising means to the end of elevation and empowerment of a people, but they lose their effectiveness when they become full ends in themselves." "It will be an irony of recorded history," the sociologist went on to observe, "that segregation was used to hold us down in the first half of the century but integration, or its tokenistic ideals, will be used to hold us down in the second half." In regards to black studies itself he would soon go on to remark upon the paradox that a separatist-flavored cry for black studies had brought more black students and faculty to white campuses in three or four years than three or four decades of bootless integrationist cries. _______ The Case for Black Studies “Appalling” is the only word I know that begins to describe the sneaky way in which critics like Roy Wilkins accuse us of “separatism.” Our cries for more black professors and black students have padded white colleges with more blacks in two years than decades of whimpering for “integration” ever did. We blacks at white colleges remain associated with racists physically, although we seek social and psychological independence from their oppression. The Amos ‘n’ Andy administrators at Negro colleges, by contrast, are physically separated but accommodated to their dependence on white racism as well as the establishment’s remote control of their black identity. Blacks who teach at white colleges have argued long and bitterly over course content and instructor assignments with white departmental chairmen of various shades of racist persuasions. They would rather have a white moderate professor with a Ph.D. teaching a history sequence starkly barren of blackness than a black man without a degree who has spent long hours in research on the subject. They hold up the white Ph.D.’s publications in learned journals, unmindful of the fact that a black man doing research, for example, on the slavery era in “learned journals” is obliged to footnote slave- master historians or historians acceptable to a society which then condoned black slavery. Second –rate colleges require black persons with functionally white minds, using the Ph.D as one tested means of policing that policy, yet at the same time, first-class universities think nothing of hiring an unschooled Eric Hoffer, who now holds forth at Berkeley. With regard to course content, the white aim is mainly to black out the black perspective. White professors at universities such as Yale will dust off old courses in race relations and African tribalism for what might be called a polka-dot studies program, while Negro professors will trot out their old courses in Negro history and Negro music for Negro-studies courses which they cynically call black. If all a black- studies program needs is a professor with a black skin to prattle about Negro subject matter, then our Negro schools would never have failed so painfully as they have. In the search for educational relevance, black today is revolutionary and nationalistic. A black- studies program which is not revolutionary and nationalistic is, accordingly, quite profoundly irrelevant. [Webmaster's Note: Dr. Hare was writing in the Black Power stage of the movement for black revolutionary change in the United States at the end of The Sixties and in the particular context of the historic five-month black-student-led strike for black studies with the support of a predominant coalition of the students and faculty of all races on the campus, including but not limited to the American Federation of Teachers, the Students for a Democratic Society, the Third World Liberation Front and the Black Faculty Union]. The black revolutionary nationalist, aware and proud of his blackness, demands the right to exist as a distinct category, to be elevated as such by any means necessary. The Negro, contrarily, would just as soon be white. He longs to escape his blackness and, in the search for integration, achieves disintegration. Thus, the key to the difference between a black-studies program and a Negro-studies program is a black perspective. Black students are descendants of a people cut off from their attachment to land, culture and nation (or people-hood). This condition is aggravated further by a whitewashed education. The expansive phase of the black-studies program is designed to regenerate the mortified ego of the black child. For instance, a proud black history can restore and construct a sense of pastness, of collective destiny, as a springboard to the quest for a new collective future. For black children crippled by defeatist attitudes, hardened by generations of exclusion, this is potentially therapeutic. PRAGMATIC COMPONENT At the same time, we must resist the white perspective which seeks to restrict black studies to the stereotyped study of art and religion predominantly. Black studies should comprise a comprehensive, integrated body of interdisciplinary courses just as in the case of long-established departments of social science and American studies. There is a desperate need for a pragmatic component which focuses on the applied fields of knowledge such as economics. Many will argue that science and mathematics are “pure” subjects; though that may be true in a sense, the uses of science may be directed toward atomic weapons of destruction or, in the case of a community-oriented black studies, devoted to such matters as rat control. I can visualize, for instance, a reading problem in “black” mathematics that would not be saturated with middle-class referents such as stocks and bonds. Rather, the teacher might ask in order to whet the ghetto child’s appetite for math: “If you loot one store and burn two, how many do you have left?” The example might be improved; but there is no substitute for a black perspective based on the principle of self-control. _______ TO BE CONTINUED: From the forthcoming Anthology, Rebels Without a Name: Selected Essays in Black Studies and the Study of Blackness |